Abstract

Background/aims: The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens (IOL) (i.e., anterior chamber IOL [ACIOL], suture-fixated posterior chamber IOL [PCIOL], and glue-fixated PCIOL). Study design and setting: This was a randomized, prospective, interventional, comparative, clinical trial study. Subjects and methods: Patients of either sex having aphakia and lacking posterior capsular support were included in the study, and patients having corneal or scleral pathology, optic atrophy, uncontrolled glaucoma, retinal detachment, and other retinal pathology were excluded from the study. The patients were divided into three groups after comprehensive ophthalmological examination - Group A (secondary ACIOL) included 44 patients, Group B (secondary scleral-fixated sutured PCIOL) included 32 patients, and Group C (fibrin glue-fixated sutured PCIOL) included 34 patients. Results: A total of 110 patients were included in this study, of which 59 (53.63%) were males and 51 (46.37%) were females. The best-corrected visual acuity (VA) after 6 weeks was in the range of 20/60-20/40 in 36.4% of Group A and 40.6% of Group B patients. In Group C, 52.9% of patients had best-corrected VA in the range of 20/30-20/20. The overall complications were less in glued PCIOL group. Conclusion: It can be concluded that fibrin glue-assisted PCIOL implantation provides better visual outcome with minimal complications in eyes with deficient capsular support.

Keywords

Publication details

DOI
10.4103/ojo.ojo_134_2016
Journal
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology, 10(3), 198-204
Publisher
Medknow Publications
Open access
Gold open access

Cite this article

APA 7

Kumar, S., Singh, S., Singh, G., Rajwade, N. S., Bhalerao, S. A., & Singh, V. (2017). Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens. Oman Journal of Ophthalmology, 10(3), 198-204. https://doi.org/10.4103/ojo.ojo_134_2016

MLA 9

Kumar, Santosh, et al. "Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens." Oman Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 10, no. 3, 2017, pp. 198-204. https://doi.org/10.4103/ojo.ojo_134_2016.

Chicago (author–date)

Kumar, Santosh, Satyaprakash Singh, Gyanendra Singh, Nilesh S Rajwade, Sushank A Bhalerao, and Vinod Singh. 2017. "Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens." Oman Journal of Ophthalmology 10 (3): 198-204. https://doi.org/10.4103/ojo.ojo_134_2016.

Harvard

Kumar, S., Singh, S., Singh, G., Rajwade, N. S., Bhalerao, S. A. and Singh, V. (2017) 'Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens', Oman Journal of Ophthalmology, 10(3), pp. 198-204. doi:10.4103/ojo.ojo_134_2016.

Vancouver

Kumar S, Singh S, Singh G, Rajwade NS, Bhalerao SA, Singh V. Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens. Oman Journal of Ophthalmology. 2017;10(3):198-204. doi:10.4103/ojo.ojo_134_2016

IEEE

S. Kumar, S. Singh, G. Singh, N. S. Rajwade, S. A. Bhalerao, and V. Singh, "Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens," Oman Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 198-204, 2017, doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_134_2016.