Abstract
A verifier may authenticate every available record and still lack grounds to call an execution account complete. Such a claim requires a justified account of which records were due for the execution being assessed. We present an analytical model for retrospective coverage of declared execution-evidence obligations. Its scope binds a structured Intent, an exact Candidate, a selected analytical attempt, an execution and evidence boundary, a stage horizon, a fixed record-obligation profile, a named verifier, and an assessment cutoff. Branch and trigger premises determine obligation instances; source competence, content, integrity, and object and stage bindings determine admissibility. We distinguish closure of the obligation inventory from closure of the relevant verifier view, and define three reporting results: COMPLETE_WITHIN_SCOPE, INCOMPLETE, and UNKNOWN. These results concern current coverage of obligations due at the cutoff. Execution progress, external outcome knowledge, and historical delivery timeliness are reported separately. Constructed service-principal-disablement cases demonstrate complete dispatch and refusal branches, a due but missing final-result record, subsequent coverage after late delivery, and the limits of extending one selected attempt's coverage to all attempts. The contribution is an execution-specific composition of scope, branch, horizon, obligations, admissibility, view, and cutoff. Completeness remains conditional on the declared profile and assessment premises.
Keywords
Subject
Publication details
- Journal
- Not available
- Open access
- Green open access
Cite this article
APA 7
Wu, M., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., & Deng, J. (2026). Evidence Coverage for Intent-Bound Execution: Scope, Obligations, and Cutoff Reasoning. https://omanscience.com/en/articles/evidence-coverage-for-intent-bound-execution-scope-obligations-and-cutoff-reasoning
MLA 9
Wu, Mengting, et al. "Evidence Coverage for Intent-Bound Execution: Scope, Obligations, and Cutoff Reasoning." https://omanscience.com/en/articles/evidence-coverage-for-intent-bound-execution-scope-obligations-and-cutoff-reasoning.
Chicago (author–date)
Wu, Mengting, Lin Wang, Yong Zhang, and Jiang Deng. 2026. "Evidence Coverage for Intent-Bound Execution: Scope, Obligations, and Cutoff Reasoning." https://omanscience.com/en/articles/evidence-coverage-for-intent-bound-execution-scope-obligations-and-cutoff-reasoning.
Harvard
Wu, M., Wang, L., Zhang, Y. and Deng, J. (2026) 'Evidence Coverage for Intent-Bound Execution: Scope, Obligations, and Cutoff Reasoning', Available at: https://omanscience.com/en/articles/evidence-coverage-for-intent-bound-execution-scope-obligations-and-cutoff-reasoning.
Vancouver
Wu M, Wang L, Zhang Y, Deng J. Evidence Coverage for Intent-Bound Execution: Scope, Obligations, and Cutoff Reasoning. https://omanscience.com/en/articles/evidence-coverage-for-intent-bound-execution-scope-obligations-and-cutoff-reasoning
IEEE
M. Wu, L. Wang, Y. Zhang, and J. Deng, "Evidence Coverage for Intent-Bound Execution: Scope, Obligations, and Cutoff Reasoning," https://omanscience.com/en/articles/evidence-coverage-for-intent-bound-execution-scope-obligations-and-cutoff-reasoning.