[
    {
        "id": "osp-12758",
        "type": "article-journal",
        "title": "The use of toric intraocular lens to correct astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery",
        "author": [
            {
                "family": "Khan",
                "given": "Mohammad I"
            },
            {
                "family": "Ch'ng",
                "given": "Soon W"
            },
            {
                "family": "Muhtaseb",
                "given": "Mohammed"
            }
        ],
        "URL": "https://omanscience.com/ar/articles/the-use-of-toric-intraocular-lens-to-correct-astigmatism-at-the-time-of-cataract-surgery",
        "language": "en",
        "issued": {
            "date-parts": [
                [
                    2015
                ]
            ]
        },
        "container-title": "Oman Journal of Ophthalmology",
        "volume": "8",
        "issue": "1",
        "page": "38-43",
        "DOI": "10.4103/0974-620x.149865",
        "publisher": "Medknow Publications",
        "ISSN": "0974-620X",
        "abstract": "Background: To evaluate the visual and refractive outcomes of cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation at a teaching hospital of the United Kingdom.\n\nDesign: Prospective interventional case series.\n\nMaterials and methods: This study compared the outcome of 3 groups of patients: Group 1 included 25 eyes with cataract and more than 2.5 diopters (D) of corneal astigmatism receiving a toric monofocal IOL; Group 2 had 18 patients with cataract and more than 2.5 D of astigmatism but receiving a non-toric monofocal IOL; while Group 3 had 25 patients with cataract and less than 1.5 D of astigmatism and receiving a non-toric monofocal IOL. Data collected included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, refraction and corneal keratometry. Postoperative examinations were scheduled at 1 and 6 weeks.\n\nResults: Postoperatively the mean UDVA was LogMAR 0.27 ± 0.20 (equivalent snellen acuity of 20/37) in Group 1, 0.54 ± 0.22 (20/69) in Group 2 and 0.16 ± 0.20 (20/29) in Group 3. The mean CDVA was LogMAR 0.08 ± 0.13 (20/24) in Group 1, 0.23 ± 0.16 (20/34) in Group 2 and 0.04 ± 0.13 in Group 3 (20/22). The mean preoperative keratometric cylinder was 3.78 ± 1.0 D in Group 1, 3.41 ± 1.47 D in Group 2 and 0.97 ± 0.43D in Group 3; the mean postoperative subjective cylinder was 1.2 ± 0.68 D in Group 1, 3.23 ± 1.41 D in Group 2 and 0.95 ± 0.58 D in Group 3. The difference was statistically significant for the postoperative refractive cylinder values when comparing Group 1 to Group 2 (P ="
    }
]