[
    {
        "id": "osp-23082",
        "type": "article-journal",
        "title": "JevOut: Natural Context Can Flip Decision Models",
        "author": [
            {
                "family": "Xu",
                "given": "Zixiang"
            },
            {
                "family": "Song",
                "given": "Zirui"
            },
            {
                "family": "Zhang",
                "given": "Chiyu"
            },
            {
                "family": "Chen",
                "given": "Xiuying"
            },
            {
                "family": "Liu",
                "given": "Xi"
            },
            {
                "family": "Hu",
                "given": "Xiyang"
            },
            {
                "family": "Zhao",
                "given": "Yue"
            }
        ],
        "URL": "https://omanscience.com/ar/articles/jevout-natural-context-can-flip-decision-models",
        "language": "en",
        "issued": {
            "date-parts": [
                [
                    2026
                ]
            ]
        },
        "abstract": "An ordinary-looking background detail can turn a correct model decision into a confident mistake. We demonstrate this fragility in four decision systems, including Jev, across seven datasets covering knowledge, reasoning, and tool routing. Within 64 accepted target evaluations per decision, we uncover short context additions that redirect 61.4%-73.2% of each system's initially correct decisions toward a wrong option fixed in advance. The additions supply background or procedural information rather than explicit answer-selection instructions, leaving the original question and choices intact. We construct them through probability-guided context optimization, which uses shifts in the option distribution to refine surrounding text under naturalness and answer-preservation constraints. Redirection affects initially confident decisions, often produces high-confidence wrong choices, and transfers across models. In blinded human evaluation, 91.6% of 250 sampled successful contexts are judged natural, answer-preserving, and free of decisive answer-changing evidence by a majority of three independent annotators. These findings expose a weakness in current decision models: context that looks entirely compatible with an input can redirect the choices that agents, routers, and evaluators rely on."
    }
]