[
    {
        "id": "osp-10818",
        "type": "article-journal",
        "title": "Interpreting Neonatal Growth Parameters in Oman: Are we doing it right?",
        "author": [
            {
                "family": "Abdulrahim",
                "given": "Reem M."
            },
            {
                "family": "Idris",
                "given": "Ahmed B."
            },
            {
                "family": "Abdellatif",
                "given": "Asad"
            },
            {
                "family": "Mohamed",
                "given": ""
            },
            {
                "family": "Fuller",
                "given": "Nigel"
            }
        ],
        "URL": "https://omanscience.com/ar/articles/interpreting-neonatal-growth-parameters-in-oman-are-we-doing-it-right",
        "language": "en",
        "issued": {
            "date-parts": [
                [
                    2025
                ]
            ]
        },
        "container-title": "Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal",
        "volume": "17",
        "issue": "4",
        "page": "411-417",
        "DOI": "10.18295/squmj.2017.17.04.006",
        "publisher": "Sultan Qaboos University",
        "ISSN": "2075-051X",
        "abstract": "Objectives: This study aimed to compare reference anthropometric measures of Omani neonates with the international standard growth charts of the World Health Organization (WHO) in order to determine the appropriateness of these growth charts to assess the growth of Omani neonates. Methods: This cross-sectional study included all healthy full-term Omani neonates born between November 2014 and November 2015 at the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman. Birth weight, length and head circumference measurementswere identified and compared to those of the 2006 WHO growth charts. Results: A total of 2,766 full-term neonates were included in the study, of which 1,401 (50.7%) were male and 1,365 (49.3%) were female. Mean birth weightsfor Omani males and females were 3.16 ± 0.39 kg and 3.06 ± 0.38 kg, respectively; these were significantly lower than the WHO standard measurements (P"
    }
]